What is an IDOR Attack?

IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference) is a security vulnerability that occurs when an attacker can directly access objects (e.g., files, database records, or user data) through user-supplied input. This vulnerability allows attackers to bypass authorization mechanisms and gain access to unauthorized resources, potentially leading to data leakage, manipulation, or destruction.

In simpler terms, IDOR happens when an application exposes an internal object reference (like a database ID, file name, or user account) to the user and fails to validate if the user is authorized to access that object.

Root Cause of IDOR: Example Code

The root cause of IDOR vulnerabilities is improper validation of user input and improper access control checks. Let’s consider an example:

Imagine a simple web application where users can view their profiles by visiting a URL like this:

https://example.com/user/profile?id=123

Here, id=123 refers to the user’s profile ID in the database. If the application fails to validate that the user is authorized to view the profile with id=123, an attacker can change the id parameter and potentially access the profile of another user, such as id=124, without authorization.

Example Code with IDOR Vulnerability:

@app.route('/user/profile', methods=['GET'])
def profile():
    user_id = request.args.get('id')  # Get user ID from the URL
    user = get_user_from_db(user_id)  # Fetch user from the database
    return render_template('profile.html', user=user)

In this code, there is no access control to verify whether the logged-in user is authorized to view the profile of user_id=123. An attacker could modify the URL like this:

https://example.com/user/profile?id=124

This would give them access to the profile of user_id=124, assuming the attacker knows or guesses valid IDs.

Example of an HTTP Request with IDOR

Let’s take a closer look at the HTTP request for a vulnerable IDOR endpoint:

Example Request:

GET /user/profile?id=123 HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Authorization: Bearer <user_access_token>

In this request:

  • The id=123 is the parameter passed to the server, indicating the profile the user wants to access.
  • The Authorization header might be used to authenticate the user, but it doesn’t necessarily protect against unauthorized access to other users’ profiles.

If the application does not properly check whether the authenticated user (who sent the request with Authorization: Bearer <user_access_token>) is authorized to view the profile of id=123, then the attack becomes possible.

An attacker might modify the request to:


GET /user/profile?id=124 HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com
Authorization: Bearer <user_access_token>

This request would allow the attacker to view user 124’s profile, assuming they know or can guess the id=124.

Also Read: Why Cybersecurity is the Career Path to Pursue

How to Prevent IDOR Attacks

To prevent IDOR vulnerabilities, you must ensure that sensitive objects or resources (like database records, files, etc.) are properly validated and access-controlled based on the user’s permissions. Here are some best practices:

  1. Enforce Object-Level Authorization:
    Every time a user accesses an object (e.g., a profile, document, or any resource), the system must check if the current user has the appropriate permissions for that object.

    @app.route('/user/profile', methods=['GET'])
    def profile():
        user_id = request.args.get('id')
        # Check if the logged-in user is authorized to view the profile
        if not is_authorized_to_view(user_id):
            abort(403)  # Forbidden, user is not authorized
        user = get_user_from_db(user_id)
        return render_template('profile.html', user=user)
          
  2. Use Indirect Object References:
    Instead of exposing internal object references like database IDs (user_id, document_id), use indirect references such as UUIDs or token-based references. This adds an additional layer of obfuscation, making it harder for attackers to guess or enumerate valid object references.

    
    @app.route('/user/profile', methods=['GET'])
    def profile():
        token = request.args.get('token')  # Use token instead of id
        user = get_user_by_token(token)  # Fetch the user from the database using the token
        return render_template('profile.html', user=user)
          
  3. Limit Object Visibility:
    Ensure that only the necessary information is exposed to users. For example, a user should only be able to see their own profile or resources. If an endpoint exposes a list of objects, make sure to validate that the user can only access objects they own.
  4. Use Role-Based Access Control (RBAC):
    Implement role-based access control to enforce the principle of least privilege. Ensure that users are granted only the permissions necessary to perform their tasks and that unauthorized users cannot access restricted data.
  5. Audit and Monitor Access:
    Regularly audit logs to detect unusual access patterns. Monitoring for potential unauthorized access to resources can help detect and mitigate IDOR attacks early.

Why Using UUIDs Alone Is Not Enough

User bypassing access control in web app
Illustration of IDOR vulnerability prevention

While UUIDs (Universal Unique Identifiers) are more difficult to guess than sequential IDs, they alone are not sufficient to protect against IDOR attacks. Here’s why:

  • UUIDs Are Still Exposed: Other endpoints or APIs may still expose the UUID to the client (e.g., in URLs or responses). Attackers can still access these UUIDs and attempt to manipulate them.
  • Brute Force Attacks: While UUIDs are long, they are still finite. An attacker might attempt to brute-force UUIDs, especially if they are sequential or follow a predictable pattern.
  • Authorization is Key: The most important factor is ensuring that the user is authorized to access a specific resource, not just hiding the ID behind a UUID.

Therefore, authorization checks should always be in place to validate the user’s permission to access the requested resource, regardless of whether the identifier is a simple integer or a UUID.

Conclusion

IDOR attacks represent a serious security risk because they allow attackers to access unauthorized resources by exploiting insecure references. By implementing proper access control mechanisms, using indirect object references (e.g., secure tokens or UUIDs), and enforcing strong user authentication and authorization checks, you can mitigate the risk of IDOR vulnerabilities in your applications.

Remember, using UUIDs as identifiers can help obfuscate object references, but it should always be coupled with robust access control and validation checks to effectively protect against these attacks.

Practice IDOR attacks and much more on AppSecMaster

  • Learn by doing: Our hands-on challenges provide a practical, real-world learning experience.
  • Improve your security skills: Gain valuable insights into source code vulnerabilities and how to address them.
  • Become a better developer or pentester: Build a strong foundation in secure coding and vulnerability assessment.

At AppSecMaster, we are committed to empowering developers and pentesters to create secure applications by teaching them how to spot and fix vulnerabilities through source code review. Join us today and start your journey toward becoming an AppSec master!

FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)

1. Can IDOR vulnerabilities exist in mobile or API-based applications?

Yes, absolutely. IDOR flaws are not limited to web apps—they often appear in APIs and mobile apps, especially when client-side parameters (like user IDs or file tokens) are trusted without server-side authorization checks. API-first or mobile-driven platforms are particularly susceptible if access control logic is missing or misconfigured on the backend.

2. What are the signs that my application might be vulnerable to IDOR?

Red flags include exposing object IDs in URLs or request bodies without verifying ownership, lacking role-based access control, or assuming authentication equals authorization. If users can modify identifiers (like /user/456) and receive a valid response without checks, you likely have an IDOR issue.

3. How does IDOR differ from broken access control?

IDOR is a specific subset of broken access control. While broken access control refers to any failure to enforce proper permissions, IDOR occurs when attackers directly reference internal objects (IDs, filenames, etc.) that aren’t adequately protected, making it one of the most common and dangerous forms of this category.

4. Can automated tools detect IDOR vulnerabilities reliably?

Some tools can catch simple IDOR patterns, but most real-world IDOR issues require manual testing. Tools often miss logical access flaws, mainly when object access depends on business rules or dynamic context. Human testers are better at identifying the nuanced conditions under which IDOR vulnerabilities occur.

5. Why is user enumeration a risk factor for IDOR attacks?

User enumeration makes IDOR easier to exploit. If attackers can discover valid user IDs or object references through public APIs, error messages, or predictable patterns, they can automate IDOR attempts. Preventing IDOR also means limiting what identifiers are exposed and ensuring they’re non-sequential and hard to guess.